2006 Cadillac BLS vs. 1962 Ford Taunus
To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,899 cc, 2006 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac BLS | 1962 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | BLS | Taunus |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1899 cc | 1183 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1600 mm |