2006 Cadillac BLS vs. 1965 Holden EH
To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac BLS | 1965 Holden EH | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | BLS | EH |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1899 cc | 2930 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1740 mm |