2006 Cadillac BLS vs. 1967 Citroen DS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Citroen DS would be higher. At 1,911 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac BLS (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1967 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1967 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 180 kg more than 1967 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac BLS | 1967 Citroen DS | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | BLS | DS |
Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 1911 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 65 L |