2006 Cadillac BLS vs. 1974 Chrysler 160
To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,899 cc, 2006 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1974 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac BLS | 1974 Chrysler 160 | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | BLS | 160 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1899 cc | 1639 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |