2006 Cadillac BLS vs. 1982 Lada 2105
To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac BLS (174 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1982 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1982 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 500 kg more than 1982 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Lada 2105 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lada 2105. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac BLS | 1982 Lada 2105 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lada |
Model | BLS | 2105 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2430 mm |