2006 Cadillac BLS vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass has manual transmission. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac BLS | 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
Model | BLS | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1899 cc | 2474 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |