2006 Cadillac BLS vs. 1989 Ford Sierra
To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Ford Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Ford Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac BLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1989 Ford Sierra has manual transmission. 1989 Ford Sierra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac BLS | 1989 Ford Sierra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | BLS | Sierra |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1899 cc | 2933 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
