2006 Cadillac BLS vs. 1992 Rover 216
To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 216. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 216 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac BLS (174 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1992 Rover 216. (122 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 216. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 410 kg more than 1992 Rover 216. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 216. (140 Nm @ 5700 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 216.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac BLS | 1992 Rover 216 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | BLS | 216 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 55 L |
