2006 Cadillac BLS vs. 2004 Marcos TS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Marcos TS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Marcos TS would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Marcos TS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Marcos TS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Marcos TS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac BLS | 2004 Marcos TS | |
Make | Cadillac | Marcos |
Model | BLS | TS |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1899 cc | 5000 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |