2006 Cadillac BLS vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer

To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac BLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac BLS would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac BLS (174 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer. (196 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac BLS 2012 Mitsubishi Lancer
Make Cadillac Mitsubishi
Model BLS Lancer
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 174 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 265 Nm 196 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 4582 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1763 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1516 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2634 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L 59 L