2006 Cadillac BLS vs. 2013 Acura RDX
To start off, 2013 Acura RDX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac BLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac BLS would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Acura RDX is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Acura RDX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac BLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Acura RDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac BLS | 2013 Acura RDX | |
| Make | Cadillac | Acura |
| Model | BLS | RDX |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1899 cc | 2300 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1872 mm |
