2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1941 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1941 Cadillac 62. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1941 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 170 kg more than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1941 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | CTS | 62 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 5676 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3210 mm |
