2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1941 Rover P2
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Rover P2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Rover P2 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1941 Rover P2. (47 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1941 Rover P2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 172 kg more than 1941 Rover P2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1941 Rover P2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | CTS | P2 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1941 |
| Engine Size | 2786 cc | 1577 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1420 kg |
