2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1942 Skoda Superb
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Skoda Superb. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Skoda Superb would be higher. At 3,137 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Skoda Superb is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1942 Skoda Superb. (79 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1942 Skoda Superb. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Skoda Superb weights approximately 208 kg more than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1942 Skoda Superb, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1942 Skoda Superb | |
Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
Model | CTS | Superb |
Year Released | 2006 | 1942 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 3137 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |