2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1943 Rover P2
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Rover P2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Rover P2 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1943 Rover P2. (47 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1943 Rover P2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 374 kg more than 1943 Rover P2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1943 Rover P2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | CTS | P2 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1943 |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1577 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 1420 kg |