2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1946 Triumph 1800
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Triumph 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Triumph 1800 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1946 Triumph 1800. (64 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1946 Triumph 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 654 kg more than 1946 Triumph 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1946 Triumph 1800 | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | CTS | 1800 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1774 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 6.7:1 |
Top Speed | 236 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2550 mm |