2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1946 Triumph 1800
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Triumph 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Triumph 1800 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 336 more horse power than 1946 Triumph 1800. (64 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1946 Triumph 1800.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1946 Triumph 1800 | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | CTS | 1800 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1774 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2550 mm |