2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1947 Simca 5
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Simca 5 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1947 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1947 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1032 kg more than 1947 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1947 Simca 5 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Simca |
| Model | CTS | 5 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1947 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2786 cc | 570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2010 mm |
