2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1949 Fiat 500
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 384 more horse power than 1949 Fiat 500. (16 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1949 Fiat 500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1949 Fiat 500 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | CTS | 500 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1949 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 569 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1290 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 35 L |
