2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1949 Toyota SA
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Toyota SA would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1949 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1949 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 422 kg more than 1949 Toyota SA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1949 Toyota SA | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | CTS | SA |
Year Released | 2006 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2410 mm |