2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1950 DKW F 89
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 376 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1950 DKW F 89 | |
| Make | Cadillac | DKW |
| Model | CTS | F 89 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 684 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2360 mm |
