2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1950 GAZ M-20

To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1950 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1950 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 132 kg more than 1950 GAZ M-20. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 GAZ M-20. (126 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 GAZ M-20.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac CTS 1950 GAZ M-20
Make Cadillac GAZ
Model CTS M-20
Year Released 2006 1950
Engine Size 2786 cc 2120 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 211 HP 51 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 263 Nm 126 Nm
Torque RPM 3300 RPM 2200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1592 kg 1460 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4670 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1650 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2710 mm