2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1953 DKW F 89
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1953 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1953 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 836 kg more than 1953 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1953 DKW F 89 | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | CTS | F 89 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 684 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1580 mm |