2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1954 DKW F 89
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1954 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1954 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 708 kg more than 1954 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1954 DKW F 89 | |
| Make | Cadillac | DKW |
| Model | CTS | F 89 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2801 cc | 682 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1580 mm |
