2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1955 Lancia D 50
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Lancia D 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Lancia D 50 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1955 Lancia D 50. (247 HP @ 8100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1955 Lancia D 50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1106 kg more than 1955 Lancia D 50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1955 Lancia D 50 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
| Model | CTS | D 50 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 8100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 640 kg |
