2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1955 Maserati 150S
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Maserati 150S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Maserati 150S would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (255 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1955 Maserati 150S. (138 HP @ 7500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1955 Maserati 150S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 962 kg more than 1955 Maserati 150S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1955 Maserati 150S | |
| Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
| Model | CTS | 150S |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3556 cc | 1484 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2160 mm |
