2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1956 Subaru K 111
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Subaru K 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Subaru K 111 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1956 Subaru K 111. (16 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1956 Subaru K 111. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1409 kg more than 1956 Subaru K 111. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1956 Subaru K 111 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
| Model | CTS | K 111 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 356 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1310 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 1810 mm |
