2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1956 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (215 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 580 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1956 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | CTS | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2540 mm |
