2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1957 Holden FJ
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Holden FJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Holden FJ would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (255 HP) has 196 more horse power than 1957 Holden FJ. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1957 Holden FJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 592 kg more than 1957 Holden FJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1957 Holden FJ | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | CTS | FJ |
Year Released | 2006 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3556 cc | 2150 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2620 mm |