2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1957 Maserati 300
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Maserati 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Maserati 300 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1957 Maserati 300. (242 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1957 Maserati 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 996 kg more than 1957 Maserati 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1957 Maserati 300 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
| Model | CTS | 300 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1957 |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 2991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2320 mm |
