2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1958 Ford Anglia
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 369 more horse power than 1958 Ford Anglia. (31 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford Anglia.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 465 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Ford Anglia. (71 Nm @ 2150 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Ford Anglia.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1958 Ford Anglia | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | CTS | Anglia |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1172 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 31 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 536 Nm | 71 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2150 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2220 mm |
