2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1959 Cadillac 62

To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 598 kg more than 2006 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (262 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac CTS. 1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2006 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2006 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac CTS 1959 Cadillac 62
Make Cadillac Cadillac
Model CTS 62
Year Released 2006 1959
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2792 cc 6381 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 212 HP 325 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 262 Nm 583 Nm
Torque RPM 3300 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 101.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74.8 mm 98.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.1:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 2218 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 5720 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 2040 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 3310 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 75 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]