2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1959 Nissan 211
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Nissan 211. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Nissan 211 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1959 Nissan 211. (34 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1959 Nissan 211. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 667 kg more than 1959 Nissan 211. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Nissan 211. (66 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Nissan 211.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1959 Nissan 211 | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | CTS | 211 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1959 |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 263 Nm | 66 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2230 mm |