2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1960 DAF 600
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DAF 600 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1960 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1960 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1116 kg more than 1960 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (342 Nm) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 DAF 600. (46 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1960 DAF 600 | |
| Make | Cadillac | DAF |
| Model | CTS | 600 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 342 Nm | 46 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 28 L |
