2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1960 Peugeot 203
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP) has 356 more horse power than 1960 Peugeot 203. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1960 Peugeot 203.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 456 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Peugeot 203. (80 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Peugeot 203.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1960 Peugeot 203 | |
Make | Cadillac | Peugeot |
Model | CTS | 203 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1290 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 44 HP |
Torque | 536 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |