2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1961 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1961 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1961 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 927 kg more than 1961 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1961 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Cadillac | DAF |
Model | CTS | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2006 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2060 mm |