2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 482 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1963 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Cadillac | DKW |
| Model | CTS | Munga |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2786 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 31 L |
