2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1246 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | CTS | Fronte |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 358 cc |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2060 mm |