2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1963 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1963 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1963 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 632 kg more than 1963 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1963 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Cadillac | Wartburg |
Model | CTS | 312 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2786 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 263 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 6.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 43 L |