2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1964 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 338 more horse power than 1964 Triumph Spitfire. (62 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph Spitfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 445 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph Spitfire. (91 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1964 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | CTS | Spitfire |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1147 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 91 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 40 L |