2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 489 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Cadillac | Seat |
Model | CTS | 600 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 767 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 536 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2010 mm |