2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1966 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 451 kg more than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1966 Isuzu Bellel | |
Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
Model | CTS | Bellel |
Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1991 cc |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 342 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 40 L |