2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1968 Mercury Marauder

To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercury Marauder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercury Marauder would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Mercury Marauder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1968 Mercury Marauder. (171 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1968 Mercury Marauder. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercury Marauder weights approximately 403 kg more than 2006 Cadillac CTS.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mercury Marauder (383 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (263 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1968 Mercury Marauder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac CTS 1968 Mercury Marauder
Make Cadillac Mercury
Model CTS Marauder
Year Released 2006 1968
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2786 cc 6392 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 211 HP 171 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 263 Nm 383 Nm
Torque RPM 3300 RPM 2600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1592 kg 1995 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 5640 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 2040 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 3160 mm