2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1969 DAF 44
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 DAF 44 would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1969 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1969 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 863 kg more than 1969 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 DAF 44. (65 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1969 DAF 44 | |
| Make | Cadillac | DAF |
| Model | CTS | 44 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2801 cc | 842 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 263 Nm | 65 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 755 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2260 mm |
