2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1969 DAF 44
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 DAF 44 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1969 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1969 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1039 kg more than 1969 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 DAF 44. (65 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1969 DAF 44 | |
| Make | Cadillac | DAF |
| Model | CTS | 44 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 842 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 232 Nm | 65 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 755 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2260 mm |
