2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1970 Mazda 616
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1970 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 880 kg more than 1970 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1970 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | CTS | 616 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1970 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2480 mm |