2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1971 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1971 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1971 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 501 kg more than 1971 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Triumph 2000. (136 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1971 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | CTS | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 342 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2700 mm |
