2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1972 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,752 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford Mustang (330 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 304 kg more than 1972 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Mustang (502 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (300 Nm). This means 1972 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac CTS 1972 Ford Mustang
Make Cadillac Ford
Model CTS Mustang
Year Released 2006 1972
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3173 cc 5752 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 215 HP 330 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 502 Nm
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 101.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 88.9 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1790 kg 1486 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 4820 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1280 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2780 mm