2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1972 Steyr 126
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Steyr 126. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Steyr 126 would be higher. At 2,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1972 Steyr 126. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1972 Steyr 126. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1007 kg more than 1972 Steyr 126. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1972 Steyr 126 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Steyr |
| Model | CTS | 126 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 2786 cc | 643 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1380 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 1850 mm |
