2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1973 Volkswagen 1303
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Volkswagen 1303. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Volkswagen 1303 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1973 Volkswagen 1303. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1973 Volkswagen 1303. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 990 kg more than 1973 Volkswagen 1303. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1973 Volkswagen 1303 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
| Model | CTS | 1303 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1973 |
| Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2410 mm |
